Configuring Docker in order to run properly behind a company proxy

Quick post to remember how to setup Docker in order to run behind a proxy:

1. Create docker service configuration file:

sudo mkdir /etc/systemd/system/docker.service.d
sudo touch /etc/systemd/system/docker.service.d/http-proxy.conf
sudo nano /etc/systemd/system/docker.service.d/http-proxy.conf

Add the following:


where xxx is the host and yyy is the port of course!

2. Check and apply configuration:

sudo systemctl daemon-reload

Check proper configuration:

sudo systemctl show --property Environment docker

Restart docker if the command output is correct:

sudo systemctl restart docker

You might wish to customize your bashrc too (~/.bashrc), by adding:

export http_proxy="http://xxx:yyy"
export https_proxy="https://xxx:yyy"

[Python recipe] Run a Flask web application locally in https


You want to run a Flask application on your development machine using https.


Provided that you have openssl installed (apt-get install openssl -y on ubuntu), we can create a self signed SSL certificate:

cd /your_project_dir

mkdir ssl && cd ssl

openssl genrsa -des3 -passout pass:x -out server.pass.key 2048

openssl rsa -passin pass:x -in server.pass.key -out server.key

rm server.pass.key

openssl req -new -key server.key -out server.csr

openssl x509 -req -sha256 -days 365 -in server.csr -signkey server.key -out server.crt

Once the certificate has been generated, we can configure the Flask app to run in https using it (in the python code I’m assuming that the application code is under the “src” folder).
The Flask app should be configured with the option ssl_context which accepts a tuple containing the paths of .crt and .key files.
In the main application module:

ssl_dir: str = os.path.dirname(__file__).replace('src', 'ssl')
key_path: str = os.path.join(ssl_path, 'server.key')
crt_path: str = os.path.join(ssl_path, 'server.crt')
ssl_context: tuple = (crt_path, key_path)'', 8000, debug=False, ssl_context=ssl_context)

Now you should be able to reach your app from any device in your local network with https://your-machine-ip:8000


This recipe has been tested with Flask 0.12.1 on Ubuntu, older versions may behave differently.

The definitive guide to solve the infamous Python exception “ModuleNotFoundError”

Among common Python exceptions, the most infamous and time consuming one to solve is no doubt the “ModuleNotFoundError” but actually is pretty simple to fix once you understand a couple of concepts.
Fundamentally it can be raised for three reasons:

1. A typo or a wrong path specified in the import statement

This is the most easy to spot, and if you are using an IDE like PyCharm you will notice it immediately before running your code.

In order to reproduce the exception, let’s consider a project structure like:


A containing:

from import BarClass
c = BarClass()

and containing:

class BarClass:

By using /proj as a current working directory and by running:


We will obtain the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/dave/PycharmProjects/proj/", line 1, in <module>
    from import BarClass
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'fo'

To solve the problem, we have simply to change the import in order to match the right path (“” instead of “”):

from import BarClass
c = BarClass()

So far, so easy… but let’s go on with scenario N.2

2. Execution context which requires an entry addition in sys.path that has not been satisfied

This one occurs when we are executing a python script with an import statement in a directory from which the interpreter cannot resolve the path to the required module defined in the import statement due to missing or bad configuration of the sys.path.
And, here you have first to understand how Python lookup for modules works, so I report the official documentation:

When a module named spam is imported, the interpreter first searches for a built-in module with that name. If not found, it then searches for a file named in a list of directories given by the variable sys.path. sys.path is initialized from these locations:

  1. The directory containing the input script (or the current directory when no file is specified).
  2. PYTHONPATH (a list of directory names, with the same syntax as the shell variable PATH).
  3. The installation-dependent default.

Let’s keep the structure of the scenario N.1, but with containing:

class BaseClass:

and containing:

from main import BaseClass
c = BaseClass()

but now let’s change the working directory to “foo”, and launch the command:


We will obtain the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "", line 1, in <module>
    from main import BaseClass
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'main'

Because since we are in the “foo” directory and we didn’t update the sys.path, Python is looking for a file in that directory and obviously is not the case!
We can fix this issue in two ways: by using the PYTHONPATH environment variable or by extending the sys.path list.
To use the PYTHONPATH in a single shot, we can launch the script with the following command:

PYTHONPATH=../ python

In this way, we are practically saying “hey python, please consider also the parent directory for the module lookup”.
The same can be specified programmatically in this way:

import sys

Of course the code above must be written before the other import statement. Anyway my advice is to avoid such approach and to relay only on the PYTHONPATH environment variable.
Use sys.path instead to debug your current path resolution in this way:

import sys

for p in sys.path:

3. Circular dependency

This one is the most hateful that you can face. It happens when a module A requires something from a module B and in turn, the module B requires something from module A, thus generating a “deadly” circular reference.
In most cases it happens after an automatic refactoring with PyCharm (typically if you use the logging framework in the classical way)*, if it happens for other reasons it’s a signal that your software design is not sound and that you must review it carefully.

* for a classical usage of the logging framework I mean:

import logging

log = logging.getLogger(__name__)

class MyClass:
    def my_method(self):'My method invoked')

then after moving MyClass to another module (via automatic refactoring), PyCharm tends to include an import of log (which 1. is not required since each module has its logger, 2. may cause the circular dependency).
To manually reproduce the exception, let’s consider a super simple structure like the following:


With containing:

from b import ClassB

class ClassA:
    def __init__(self):
        self.b = ClassB()

and containing:

from a import ClassA

class ClassB:

a = ClassA()

By running python in the project root, we will get the following exception:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/dave/PycharmProjects/proj/", line 1, in <module>
    from b import ClassB
  File "/Users/dave/PycharmProjects/proj/", line 1, in <module>
    from a import ClassA
  File "/Users/dave/PycharmProjects/proj/", line 1, in <module>
    from b import ClassB
ImportError: cannot import name 'ClassB'

If we pay attention we can quite easily spot that this time we are facing a circular reference issue, since the stack trace is longer that the previous ones, and it prints a “ping-pong” between and

Writing better software with Python 3.6 type hints

One of the recent features of Python 3 that I like the most is definitely the support for type annotations.
Type annotations are a precious tool (especially if used in combination with an advanced IDE like PyCharm) that allow us to: write clear and implicitly documented code, prevent us from invoking methods with wrong data types (ok, actually we can do whatever at runtime since Python is a dynamic language and type hints as the name suggests is just that: an hint) and get useful code suggestions and autocompletion.
Starting with Python 3.6 is now possible to specify not only arguments type in method signatures, but also types for inline variables. Let’s see it in action with a sample code:

from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from enum import Enum
from typing import List

class Sex(Enum):
    M = 'M'
    F = 'F'

class Person:
    def __init__(self, 
                 first_name: str, 
                 last_name: str, 
                 birth_date: datetime, 
                 sex: Sex):
        self._first_name: str = first_name
        self._last_name: str = last_name
        self._birth_date: datetime = birth_date
        self._sex: Sex = sex
        self._hobbies: List[str] = []

    def get_age(self) -> int:
        diff: timedelta = - self._birth_date
        return int(diff.days / 365)

    def hobbies(self) -> List[str]:
        return self._hobbies

    def hobbies(self, hobby_list: List[str]):
        self._hobbies = hobby_list

So, basically we have created a Person class and a Sex enum and by using type hints we have declared that:
“first_name” and “last_name” must be a str type, “birth_date” a datetime type and “sex” a custom enum type Sex.
We have also specified the return type of get_age() method as int and inside its implementation we have referenced the date difference as a timedelta object.
Finally we have imported List from “typing” package in order to specify “hobbies” as a list of string objects (if we don’t care about list content we can just use list type by avoiding the import).

By using PyCharm, we can see that if we try to pass an invalid type as argument it complains as expected:

Unfortunately PyCharm does not complains if we try to specify “hobbies” via simple assignment:

But in my opinion, using the type hints as shown in the example code has the huge value of keeping code documented, especially if you work in a team, or if you want to write an open source project.

One limitation in type hints that I found is that you can’t create “circular references”, that means you can’t have a method in a class that specify itself as argument:


As suggested in the comments, this can be “bypassed” by using strings in place of types as reported here

What I hate and what I love about Mac OSX

I’ve been using OSX for almost 10 years, then I switched to Linux (Mint and Ubuntu) for a year and then I switched back to OSX.
There are several things that I hate about OSX (from a developer perspective), but eventually I realized that is the best system that fits my needs.
So, in this post I’m gonna list all the pros and all the cons about mac OSX compared to Linux or Windows, by hoping it would be useful for other developers (but not only) in order to evaluate a switch (or not) to/from mac OSX.

Let’s start with the…

Things I hate about mac OSX:

  • No “native” package manager:
    If you are a developer (especially a web developer) you need to install an huge number of libraries/packages/technologies on your machine and package managers like “apt-get” or “yum” in Linux make this task dead easy, by allowing the developer to download/compile/configure the required resources automatically and fast. On Mac OSX there are two “third party” package manager: MacPorts and Brew. While the latter seems to be the favorite by the OSX community, I slightly prefer the former for two simple reasons: it has ~4x the packages available for Brew, it’s better integrated with OSX and it doesn’t “break stuff” if you upgrade to new OSX versions. Anyway both managers are not as powerful/stable/rich as the ones available for Linux, so it may happens that a particular package is not available or that another gets updated later and upgrading/removing installed packages may be more complex compared to Linux.
  • Insensitive file system:
    Yep! on OSX “a.txt” and “A.txt” are the same file, or better you can’t have “a.txt” and “A.txt” in the same directory. While this may sounds reasonable, it may cause problems with CVS systems like git (renaming a file uppercase to lowercase or vice versa is not automatically tracked as change).
  • Silly windows maximization:
    The way Apple implemented windows maximization is just absurd! If I want to maximize a window I MEAN IT, let’s maximize that fuc**** window in order to expand to all the available space, don’t try to run “sophisticated algorithms” (I’m sarcastic of course) in order to adjust the window size based on its content!!! In OSX “el capitan” this issue have been mitigated, but maximization still sucks (especially in Finder).
  • .DS_Store files pollution:
    it’s really annoying to have these hidden files everywhere, especially if you have to share external drives with other people who don’t use OSX.
  • Worst file manager on the market:
    IMO Finder simply sucks! It has useless features like coverflow gallery and miss useful ones like split view, moreover due to the previously mentioned “Silly windows maximization” it’s really hard to make this software useful and easy to use in order to explore the file system

Things I love about mac OSX:

  • Stability:
    Love it or hate it, but Mac OSX is the most stable os on the market! In 10 years of active use I faced a kernel panic/system freeze 3/4 times only. On Linux you can “break the system” just installing/upgrading the wrong package and Windows is famous for its blue screen of death :)
  • Battery life:
    Since I use a laptop, battery life is very important and OSX is HIGHLY OPTIMIZED for the hardware on which it runs, in order to get the most from the battery. A macbook with a new battery can work for 8 hours or more (it’s ~3x the average of laptop battery duration!).
    My macbook pro has 4 years and it can still work for over than 4 hours!
  • Better performance and hardware usage:
    In addition to a better battery life OSX makes a better use of the machine hardware ensuring better performances.
    As a personal experience I recently noticed that a suite of tests I wrote for a Python project where running more than 2x slower on Linux (on the same machine).
  • Reliable suspension by closing the lid:
    You know what? I never NEVER shut down my mac! When I finish to work I simply close the lid and it goes into hibernation by “stopping the system” and preserving the battery. It can stay in that state for days and once I reopen the lid in a couple of seconds I can continue to work with all my programs still opened and properly running. This is amazing!
  • Spotlight:
    I love Spotlight! It’s one of the best software written by Apple. It’s reliable, blazing fast and versatile. I use it to launch applications in a breeze, find files on the mac and as a calculator. On Linux Gnome there is something similar, but Spotlight is far better for performance and super-fast file indexing… a killer feature of OSX!
  • Time machine:
    Another killer feature of OSX is its own backup software. It’s easy and reliable, nothing to configure but the external hard disk to use for backup storage. Time machine implements a smart incremental backup system (it means that it detects differences between the latest backup and the current system state and saves only the delta in the backup rather than the whole disk content).
    I restored my system from a Time Machine backup more than once and all went incredibly smooth (my user folders, installed app, preferences and so on were properly restored on the new machine).
  • Internet recovery:
    Did you erase your whole hard disk or did you messed up with the system so badly that it’s now not working at all and when you start your machine you see a grey screen with a question mark?
    Don’t panic! Restart the system by holding CMD + R and you will activate “Internet Recovery Mode” in which your machine will connect remotely to the Apple servers in order to download a fresh new copy of OSX and restore it on your machine… this features is super cool and deserve an huge applause to Apple!
  • I can play with all the toys I want:
    On OSX you can find several tools that are not available for Linux (Recently I’m experimenting with game development and for example Unity is not available for it a the time of this writing) and you can virtualize Windows and/or Linux or create multi boot machine with other os if you need/want to do so. The opposite instead is not possible since OSX runs only on mac hardware (ok, you can opt for hackintosh but I think it’s not the same as the native experience).
    So by using a mac with OSX you can target the web, iOS, Android, Windows, Linux, Mac or any other platform you can deploy software on it :)